<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>TRBN - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-b9699b68" type="application/json"/><link>http://trbn.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://trbn.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 08:39:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Leadership and the Rapport Factor</title><link>http://www.therugbybusinessnetwork.com/2013/05/14/leadership-and-the-rapport-factor/#comment-896990585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's quite a can of worms Phil as, speaking as someone who has worked &lt;br&gt;with business leaders across sectors and at a variety of levels, it's &lt;br&gt;clear that there isn't 1 simple leadership template. Much depends on the&lt;br&gt; nature of the business/team, the stage in the development of the &lt;br&gt;business and the level of leadership.&lt;br&gt;First line managers, for example, are hugely important pivots within a &lt;br&gt;business. They're the on-pitch leader, if you will, and have the most &lt;br&gt;impact on the frontline employees. They're RSMs or Captains in military &lt;br&gt;language.&lt;br&gt;They need to have the respect of the team and this is usually earned by &lt;br&gt;leading by example. To sustain respect most leaders, including those in &lt;br&gt;the first line, fall into 2 types in my view:&lt;br&gt;- transactional leaders (get the job done through technical &lt;br&gt;effectiveness/proficiency)&lt;br&gt;- transformational leaders (get the job done through influence and &lt;br&gt;people skills/rapport)&lt;br&gt;Most leaders need elements of both. Transactional leaders can certainly &lt;br&gt;do a very good job but tend to manage resources available, work to a &lt;br&gt;template/strategy and keep the show on the road. There are always &lt;br&gt;exceptions to every rule but think accountants/CFOs who've become CEOs &lt;br&gt;as one example or the type of captain who is so good in his position &lt;br&gt;that he's the first name on the sheet and therefore captain. almost by &lt;br&gt;default. It could be argued that Jonno/POC fall into that camp hence &lt;br&gt;MJ's struggle to inspire as a coach when he couldn't "show the way".&lt;br&gt;Transformational leaders, on the other hand, can be accused of  being &lt;br&gt;anti-establsihment mavericks or having their head in the clouds, &lt;br&gt;especially when times are tough. But it's the transformational types who&lt;br&gt; often make the visionary, game changing advances through flair and &lt;br&gt;ingenuity and who typically excel at teasing those qualities out of &lt;br&gt;their people. Eales/WJ McBride are probably more transformational but &lt;br&gt;the most obvious example is Mike Brearley from the world of cricket who &lt;br&gt;is the first to decry his technical skills but excelled at rapport.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Buckingham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 08:39:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What makes rugby unique? By James Barraclough</title><link>http://www.therugbybusinessnetwork.com/2012/07/18/what-makes-rugby-unique/#comment-771898356</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brilliantly said &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard C McKinney</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:20:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Supplements worth a working man&amp;#8217;s cash?</title><link>http://www.therugbybusinessnetwork.com/2012/11/13/are-supplements-a-working-mans-cash/#comment-732682401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i THINK THAT YOU ARE SPENDING TOO MUCH TIME ON FOCUSING ON CALORIE COUNT AND NOT ON THE FOODS AND THEIR NUTRIENTS WHAT THEY CAN DO FOR THE BODY.how good one feels is also important for a proper physical makeup.  hANANIAH&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hyankelove</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:24:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why you should host a TRBN networking event by Kevin Sullivan</title><link>http://www.therugbybusinessnetwork.com/2012/03/01/why-you-should-host-a-trbn-networking-event-by-kevin-sullivan/#comment-460953166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cheers Ian! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Sullivan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:28:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ask not what your club can do for you!!</title><link>http://www.therugbybusinessnetwork.com/2012/03/01/ask-not-what-your-club-can-do-for-you/#comment-460603434</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is sound pragmatic  advice, and backed up by a subculture  of research associated with the science of how ' you create your own luck' through the connections created. Be warned though you are who you associate with so make a bee line for the committees where you can make an impact and the people who through their contacts can in the jargon of social networking extend ' your weak ties' as you 'structure your serendipity' or just bump into a better class of people. As a voyeur of the charity scene for example it sometimes makes me question the motives of individuals. On the other hand if you do not play you cannot win. Of course there are certain fringe benefits from some of the committees- Remember those days on the Ents committee as a student. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Cross</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:34:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>